Should churches marry members of the public?
Recently I heard an interview on Radio New Zealand National in which lawyer Grant Ilingworth discussed some of the legal implications of the Marriage Equality bill currently before parliament. His view is that, as churches marry members of the general public, they wouldn't be able to refuse to marry a couple on the grounds that they were of the same sex. Institutions that offer services to the public are covered by the Bill of Rights (IIRC), which states that such institutions can't discriminate on the grounds of sexual orientation.
His view doesn't appear to be uncontested, but regardless, it led me to what I suspect is an important question. Should churches be marrying members of the public (as opposed to only marrying people within our own church communities)?
The disquiet in the Christian community at the prospect of same-sex marriages seems to hinge on the idea that such marriages are unbiblical. However, is it only same-sex marriages that fail this test?
An opini…
His view doesn't appear to be uncontested, but regardless, it led me to what I suspect is an important question. Should churches be marrying members of the public (as opposed to only marrying people within our own church communities)?
The disquiet in the Christian community at the prospect of same-sex marriages seems to hinge on the idea that such marriages are unbiblical. However, is it only same-sex marriages that fail this test?
An opini…