Healing as a sign
Recently I've found myself in a number of conversations about why God hasn't healed various people. Implicit in the question is the assumption - an assumption I've shared - that the primary reason God would heal a person is to relieve their suffering. However, as Martin and I have been reading the New Testament book of John, that assumption has been challenged.
Firstly, in John 9 Jesus and his disciples encounter a man who was blind from birth. The disciples want to know why this has happened. Jesus tells them it is "so that the works of God might be displayed in him" - presumably by the healing Jesus then carries out.
We come across something similar in John 11. Firstly, Jesus hears that his dear friend Lazarus is very sick, at which he says: "This illness will not end in death. No, it is for God’s glory so that God’s Son may be glorified through it." A few days later, news reaches Jesus that Lazarus has died. Jesus passes this news on to his di…
Firstly, in John 9 Jesus and his disciples encounter a man who was blind from birth. The disciples want to know why this has happened. Jesus tells them it is "so that the works of God might be displayed in him" - presumably by the healing Jesus then carries out.
We come across something similar in John 11. Firstly, Jesus hears that his dear friend Lazarus is very sick, at which he says: "This illness will not end in death. No, it is for God’s glory so that God’s Son may be glorified through it." A few days later, news reaches Jesus that Lazarus has died. Jesus passes this news on to his di…