Our church is currently considering a couple of big financial decisions. This has got me thinking about the philosophy Martin and I apply to our personal finances, and whether or not the church's finances should be run along similar lines. I'd like to share here some of the considerations Martin and I make when setting our household budget, and the questions those are raising for me about the church's budget. I'd be interested in your thoughts!
We try to take as our
starting point that the money we have isn't really ours - it's God's.
He, after all, owns everything! So we want to distribute the money He's
entrusted us with in a way that honours Him: in a way that reflects both that we serve a God of abundance who
desires good things for us and that our primary calling is to love both God and our neighbours with all that we have.
terms of loving our neighbours as ourselves, it might be logical to try
to keep no more money for ourselves to live on than what some 'global
average person' has to live on. After all, God loves us equally, and
it's largely the global financial system - a construct of sinful
humanity - that puts Martin in the top 1% of income-earners
globally and leaves so many others so badly off. However, doing that
would also be the end of me: after all, in most of the world, someone as
sick as I am would have died long ago.
the ideal we've chosen is to live in such as way that everyone in the
planet could live as we do: in a sense, to not use more than our 'fair share'
of resources. If everyone lived this way, we're sure that we'd have a
world where everyone could thrive. After all, God is a God of abundance
who desires good things for all His children, so we're confident that
there'd be plenty to go around.
We're a long way
from that ideal right now, but it's the direction we're trying to head
in. As we've done so, we've simplified our lives considerably, and
that's freed up funds that we've been able to use to love our neighbours
both here and overseas. Our desire to love our neighbours has
sometimes also led to us paying a bit more for some things: we pay a Living Wage for our cleaner and we buy some goods fair trade (see more here, here, here and here).
these ideas means that we live much more simply than most people we
know, but we still live far from minimally. After all, as I said at the
beginning, we serve a God who desires good things for us, so we don't
think a purely ascetic life would honour Him! Whilst we try to find
inexpensive ways to do the things we enjoy, we make sure plenty of fun
things are included :-) For example, whilst we've moved to cooking meat
only once a week, we haven't moved to the most
minimalist-yet-healthy diet we can think of (lentils/rice/veg - no
fruit, no spices, no variety). It's great to be able to enjoy all
the good things that God has given us!
We're also learning to be bold
and spend money not allowed for in our budget when we think God wants
us to. After all, He owns everything and is perfectly capable of making
up the shortfall that creates. It has been exciting to see God return
to us money we have spent in this way :-)
So, in short,
we try to guide our lifestyle choices by "could everyone afford this?"
rather than "can I afford this?". We try to use the remaining funds
entrusted to us to honour God by loving our neighbours with it. With
the funds allocated to our own use, we enjoy the abundance of good
things God makes available to all His children. And, when it seems
appropriate, we spend money on things we haven't budgeted for, trusting
God to provide for our needs as we do so.
these ideas translate to the communal life of a church? How could we
use our collective funds in a way that reflects our love of God, our
love for our neighbours and the abundance God delights to share with his
I go to a probably wealthier-than-average church in a
very wealthy country. Most of the money that comes into the church is
used to provide services for the church. This means that we are able to
pay people to do things (like office administration and cleaning) that,
in many churches, are done by the members. We can also afford to
maintain a separate church, lounge and hall as well as office space, and
to provide 'nice-to-haves' like carpet and comfortable seating.
Because we can afford these things, providing them has seemed obvious.
But, now that I've started thinking about it, I'm not sure that's
should we have all these extras, when other churches even in my own
city struggle to find the money to pay for a pastor?
I wonder if, as Martin and I have done personally, our church should
also choose a level at which we want to provide for ourselves, rather
than simply spending whatever comes in. And, if we did so, what kind of
resource use might we aim for? Aiming to provide only what is
accessible to some kind of 'global average' church would probably lead
to privations we're unwilling to put up with - as it would with our
household budget. Maybe our ideal should be some form of 'not much more
than the minimum we need in order to function as a church'? What would
that look like? I'd appreciate your thoughts!
our household budget, we may also sometimes choose to pay extra in
order to our love our neighbours: for example by paying all staff at least a Living Wage.
And we should, of course, be bold when things come up that we haven't
budgeted for, trusting God to make up the difference :-)
this way would likely lead to budget surpluses. This extra money could
be distributed to other struggling churches (or other neighbours who
are on the hearts of the congregation). Alternatively, the church could
even refuse to receive extra money. We could alert the church when
we'd received enough income for that year's budget, and the members
could then spend the money they would have given to the church as they
I've talked about some of these
ideas with one of the elders of my church, and received a fairly
positive response for such 'out-of-the-box' ideas :-) I hope to be able
to talk with him further, as well as raising these ideas with others.
Trying to develop these ideas in a vacuum would be a recipe for personal
frustration and utter ineffectiveness, after all! And, of course,
nothing may come of it. Restricting our spending in order to better
love our neighbours is an idea that has come out of Martin and I trying
to be faithful to the gospel, but there are many other ways to be
faithful, too. How we act collectively will be an expression of the
different ways the different church members have found to love God and
to love their neighbours. But I'm keen to add these ideas to the mix,
now that I've realised they could apply!
Don't you think that feijoa skins smell delicious? After you've scooped out the flesh, you're left with a skin that is tart and...
For Christmas, I wanted to make Martin a chair that he could use when he goes to the cricket or goes camping. He's already got a self-i...
Ages ago, a foraging blog I used to read taught me that kawakawa plants, not only produce leaves that make yummy tea: the plants come in mal...